Can Civilians Wear Body Cameras
Many police chiefs and regular American civilians agree that officers' body camera footage should be released to the public after police shoot someone dead.
They differ, though, on when the images should be made public. This complicates achieving accountability, which is often the reason officers wear cameras.
That's the finding of our new inquiry, published by Cambridge University Press. We surveyed 4,000 U.S. residents – ane,000 beyond the nation every bit a whole and 1,000 in each of three cities – Los Angeles, Seattle and Charlotte – which are often cited as having different policies for releasing body camera footage. We asked participants whether they identified themselves as white, Black, Hispanic or Asian. We also surveyed 1,000 police chiefs across the country.
In June 2020, weeks after the death of George Floyd while in the custody of Minneapolis police, the Pew Research Eye reported that "78% of Americans overall – just a far smaller share of black Americans (56%) – said they had at least a off-white corporeality of confidence in police officers to act in the all-time interests of the public."
Those findings are consistent with other research likewise revealing that race is a factor that influences whether Americans trust police force.
We randomly showed police chiefs body camera footage and smartphone footage of a fatal shooting. We randomly showed the 4,000 people we surveyed either body camera footage of a police officer shooting a person or a reason why they could not view that footage and then asked them whether, how and when the footage should be made public.
Nosotros institute very little geographical variation in citizens' expectations for law behavior and trust in police to use force accordingly. But nosotros institute that regular people and constabulary chiefs differed in some of their views about trunk camera recordings.
People from all beyond the country, including in the three cities nosotros focused on, generally wanted the footage to be made public. More than 9 in 10 respondents idea so. And the vast majority of law chiefs – just under 9 in 10 – agreed.
But beyond that, there were noteworthy differences in people's views nigh when and how the video should be released. A plurality of every grouping – nationwide, and in each city, and when separated by race – was content to await to see the raw footage until after an internal police investigation was complete.
Overall, on average 39% of the iv,000 citizens felt that way. Nearly half of police chiefs – 48.7% – did. Nonwhites were less willing to wait for an internal investigation to wrap upwardly before seeing the footage.
For citizens, the next nearly preferred method of seeing the footage was a release of the raw video immediately later the upshot, with betwixt one-quarter and 1-third of people seeking that. But almost 1 in 5 citizens preferred to come across edited video that was cutting and narrated to assistance explain to viewers what the police officers were doing. Just the thought of an edited video appealed to police chiefs, who far preferred that over an immediate release of unedited footage.
If body cameras are going to help improve police accountability, then it is important that police chiefs and the public hold on how and when the footage will be released.
[Deep knowledge, daily. Sign up for The Conversation's newsletter.]
Pembaca kami
Jumlah pembaca The Chat sebanyak 18 juta pengguna setiap bulan, dan melalui Creative Commons republikasi menjangkau 42 juta pembaca.
Mau menulis?
Tulis artikel dan bergabung dengan komunitas akademisi dan peneliti yang terus tumbuh dengan lebih dari 142.600 dari four.316 lembaga.
Daftar sekarang
Source: https://theconversation.com/police-and-civilians-disagree-on-when-body-camera-footage-should-be-made-public-157111
Posted by: cordeiroloores1981.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Can Civilians Wear Body Cameras"
Post a Comment